I have one question, but I want to make a couple of points of clarification first.
One is that a decision hasn't been made. An intention's been announced in a bill, it's now being considered by Parliament, and it's at committee for that reason.
Second, if we look at a deal like the casino deal, we can say it's a premium on the latest market value. But what would those market values have been if nothing had changed and the income trust had continued to evolve as it did? Surely, yes, you can say the index has come up a little in the last months. But if you do that proportionate to the TSE general index on stocks and bonds, it doesn't compare.
As far as Governor Dodge, yes, he said there were problems with the income trust sector. But he also said it was an excellent vehicle for certain sectors and it needed some repairs--not a nuclear bomb, but surgical improvements.
The question I have for Mr. Kesteven is this. Do you know of individuals who would have increased their exposure in the income trust sector because of the promise by the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance, and were therefore burned more?