It's our view, and of course we don't have firm knowledge, but if you listen to some of the government's own witnesses, people like the Governor of the Bank of Canada, they are suggesting that the model was being extended to areas outside of where it was originally intended. I don't think there's any question there was significant lobbying by CEOs who did not want to become trusts.
As a CEO of a trust you are more accountable to your unit holders than you ever are in a corporate form, and many people like spending the corporation's money in the way they see fit.
I believe the energy trust got captured in the nuclear blast—as you so rightly described the way they have taken an approach to this sector—and that the energy trust sector is perfectly suited for where it is. That's the view we are getting from people like David Dodge, from Dominic D'Alessandro, and from Kevin Dancey. So we are at a loss to understand why we are wrapped up in here, particularly since the government has stated that they acted on energy trusts because these did not exist in other jurisdictions, and that is patently untrue. Not only do they exist, they are growing at a rate that is going to dwarf what's happening in Canada.