Thank you for those questions.
This issue—the new facility, policy, or regulatory change—is something we are studying. In the context of looking at it, we will have to form a judgment about whether legislative change is required in order to enact it.
Just for education—some of you may know this—the Bank of Canada has very broad powers under paragraph 18(g) of the Bank of Canada Act, but they're powers in the case of a serious financial disruption, and that has to be declared. It can be declared ex post, but it has to be formally declared and gazetted by the governor.
It has some broad powers there, and what we're looking at is not something that would fall under this, but would be...not quotidian but a more regularly used vehicle. You can think about it as potentially akin to the Federal Reserve's discount window, which has been recently used.
Then the judgment needs to be made: is there a need for legislative change? If there's a need for legislative change—obviously, we'll take a conservative view on that—we would have to come back to explain it to this committee and to the House.
I have four more questions--