I will be very brief, because I agree with everything my three colleagues and Mr. Crête have said, but I just want to address one small point.
This notion from Mr. Del Mastro that we're pitting Canadians against Canadians, or going after unfortunate people, that's not my intent at all. There is certainly no idea in my mind that we would ever try to get the money back from those individuals, no idea in my mind that we would ask to see them as witnesses.
I think the people we would see as witnesses would be finance officials or tax officials or experts or, conceivably, Gary Lunn, and we might come up with conclusions that the government was right or wrong in what it did, or we might come up with future recommendations, but it's not calling these individuals to account whatsoever.
So I totally reject that argument, and I would certainly be in favour of the motion.