I think our research shows that the costs, first of all, back up on business.
I'll give you a very concrete example, a study we did on the border, trying to measure what happened with Canadian exporters when the U.S. border security went up and it created a barrier. It actually didn't slow exports down. We've done some pretty complex econometric analysis showing that it didn't slow exports. What it did, though, was raise the cost for our exporters in terms of complying with U.S. security legislation, and therefore it ate into their bottom line. They had to create warehouses on both sides of the line, they had to have compliance, all sorts of things that they're spending money on.
That's a pretty good analogy for what happens if infrastructure doesn't work. It means people have to start planning their business model quite differently, knowing that they're going to have bottlenecks, knowing that they can't get their truck down Highway 401, that they can't get across the bridge at Windsor, that we don't have an integrated national transportation network where they can take stuff off the ship from China and put it into their supply chain on a fairly easy basis.
Initially, the costs will go up for business. That will be the first step. The second step, of course, is that firms will have to rethink their business model and will have to think about what they can afford to do in Canada and what they might be required to do in other places just because they can't get goods to market as quickly as they should.