First of all, there's no system or policy in the world that doesn't have some effects that you don't like, and of course the question is how you deal with that. I won't comment about Ontario because I don't know enough about the actual way the experience rating is put in. I do know that, for example, in New Brunswick, when they introduced experience rating--and this was Frank McKenna who did this back in the 1980s--it had a tremendous impact in encouraging growth in the service sector, in call centres, for example, because premiums were very sharply reduced for service companies that had very little layoff or worker compensation experience. Therefore it really did achieve a much more efficient system, and you'll find that people in New Brunswick, from what I understand, are really quite happy with the experience-rating system that operates there.
I do know that Alberta has gone to individual firm experience rating, and I'm not aware that there have been significant problems, although I know that there have been issues over deficits, which is another type of difficulty that one gets with government-owned enterprises, but that's an issue they've had to deal with over time.