I just do not think those people, at the moment of their arrival, are new Canadians. Therefore, I think the 400,000 number is inflated, and the correct numbers are the landed immigrant numbers I quoted.
But let me move on now to questions of money. This is the finance committee. I would have thought that success in cleaning up a backlog requires resources to have more people interviewing and processing those people. I understand you're putting in $22 million over two years, which is little more than 1% of the budget in each year, whereas in 2005 we had committed a $700 million plan to reduce the backlog over five years. There's an order of magnitude difference in the amounts of money. So how can you credibly say that you're going to significantly reduce the backlog when you put so little--in terms of new resources--into the system?