Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
On several occasions in her remarks, the minister has said that is not their intention, that that is not what they want to do. Does she realize that by saying that, she is admitting that it is possible? Does she realize, as the president of the Association québécoise des avocats et avocates en droit de l'immigration du Québec stated two weeks ago, that the most significant change made by her bill is the change from a safe system where it says “shall”, to a purely random, arbitrary system that opens the door to discrimination? What happens if the word “shall” is changed—people have a right if they meet all the criteria—to “may”? What she is proposing is purely arbitrary. And that is precisely what concerns the groups from the various cultural communities. Can she understand that?