Yes, it's one of our major issues. With others, we put this EI surplus on the map. We talked about it when it was $15 billion and we presented to this committee, and when it was $16 billion, when it was $20 billion, when it was $30 billion, when it was $40 billion. We said you have to do something. Others got more engaged, and the labour movement got engaged, because it wasn't fair.
Now there's a reverse fairness. I have to say that to say that it's all gone and all of a sudden we're going to start with just $2 billion is wrong. That's where we're in violent agreement. I must say I didn't say it was a perfect system back then, but I agree that the government needs to backstop this more. The bill has to backstop it, I believe. If it goes below $2 billion, and all of a sudden our members have to pay additional premiums and their employees have to pay additional premiums after paying $54 billion, that's inappropriate.