My comment is not about the motion, Mr. Chair, but about the fact that Mr. Wallace's motion is pertinent to the bill we are about to debate. I have no objection to dealing with Mr. Wallace's motion, but Mr. Del Mastro's motion is about something completely different. I feel that it should go in the agenda after we have done the clause-by-clause study.
I support my colleague on that. Mr. Del Mastro's motion should be studied after we have finished the clause-by-clause study. Right afterwards, we could discuss Mr. Wallace's motion, which is relevant in that it deals with the bill we are studying.
I do not know if Mr. Pacetti has made a formal proposal, but, if possible, I would move that the agenda be amended accordingly.