My problem as chair is that we have an accelerated timeframe here. We're starting a little bit late because of votes in the House. I don't necessarily have a problem dealing with both of the motions. What I had intended to do was to hear the witnesses and then go to the motions, because that relates directly to whether we need to do questioning and how much questioning.
So if that's okay with the committee, we'll just hear the witnesses, then we'll take both motions, and then we'll proceed to questions and answers.
Is that fair?