Thank you for the question, Mr. Crête.
BQ-4 was consequential to BQ-1. That's why I linked the two of them together. In response to your question, I appreciate that.
BQ-2, BQ-3, BQ-5, and BQ-6 are all inadmissible because of the same argument with respect to the royal recommendation. They all require the royal recommendation. I was going to go through them one by one, but if you so choose, that argument applies to all of them.