No, and I'll clarify that. BQ-5 seeks to amend the bill so that the sum is increased from $500 million. BQ-6 seeks to amend the bill to provide for new construction. In both cases the amendment proposes a new scheme that seeks to alter the terms and conditions of the royal recommendation, and therefore the amendment is ruled inadmissible. That is the ruling of the chair.
Monsieur Laforest has indicated he wants to challenge the ruling. Therefore, it will be that the chair's ruling be sustained. We'll have a recorded vote.
(Ruling of the chair sustained: yeas 8; nays 3)