We're hearing that over and over again, so that's interesting.
I want to direct a question to Dr. Donner and Dr. Peters with respect to the multiplier of stimuli. You're making the argument that infrastructure is effectively your best stimulus, not tax relief and things of that nature.
The big issue for us has been the rapidity with which you can get a stimulus into the market. While in economic theory, if you will, $100 worth of infrastructure should be more stimulative than $100 worth of tax relief, the government can do tax relief today, but stimulus through infrastructure, even with the cooperation of the senior party here, is still going to go slowly into the economy.
Does your economic theory hold up given the realities of the way money flows into the economy from the government?