I appreciate that, but it is an anomaly. When you do financing for something other than financing, you create your own internal set of contradictions, and that is one of them.
Thank you.
My second question is directed to Mr. Conway. It has to do with the pension issue.
There is a lot of pressure on the government to change the ratios or to move them down and be a little more flexible, etc. With certain plans, possibly Air Canada and maybe others--I don't really know--you can move these ratios around until the deck chairs on the Titanic are nicely arranged, but the truth of the matter is that the pension plan is going to require government intervention.
Mr. Conway, should the government contemplate changing the date at which the pension is realized? In other words, should it go from age 65 to age 67 or something of that nature? Should that be on the table as a point of discussion for federally regulated pension plans?