That's actually part of a written submission to the department in 2005, 2007, and 2009. Absolutely, they should be workers' wages followed by pension holders.
On April 23rd, 2009. See this statement in context.
On April 23rd, 2009. See this statement in context.
Lobbyist, Teamsters Canada
That's actually part of a written submission to the department in 2005, 2007, and 2009. Absolutely, they should be workers' wages followed by pension holders.
See context to find out what was said next.