Sure. Again, I listened to the witnesses from the other day, and I have to say some of the rates they were talking about bore no relationship to our interchange rates. They were much higher. Again, to refer back to my speech, that's because we don't control end-user pricing.
I think one of the projects we want to undertake with the CFIB in particular is to make sure merchants understand that there are basically three kinds of acquirer contracts out there. There's flat-fee pricing, which people like because it creates price predictability, but you may be paying more for certain kinds of cards than you should have to. There's pass-through pricing, which means you have interchange plus a markup; that's hard to manage, because it creates a lot of unevenness in the costs of cards.
Then there's something in between, which I think Catherine Swift described, called qualified contracts. These are not our contracts, and I'm being very generic, but that's a world in between saying, here's your basic price and we're going to predict how much of the other cards you'll see, the corporate card or foreign card and that sort of thing. There will be a specific markup for those cards, and that creates somewhere in between predictability and appropriate pricing when the price is lower.
I don't think these concepts are well understood by small merchants, and we think we can lend a hand in making sure they understand that as they make their choices.