The issue here is parliamentary supremacy. As I understood it, Mr. Zafirovski indicated he was unavailable to come to the committee; that is, he was unwilling to come to the committee. Parliament is supreme over all matters, including legal matters. Whether or not it is in front of the courts is irrelevant. Parliament can, on demand, require any person to come before its committees.
That's what Mr. Pacetti's motion is all about, so I will be supporting it for two reasons. One, I think Mr. Zafirovski has some serious explaining to do with respect to discrepancies between how the senior executives seem to be treating themselves and the employees seem to be treated; and second of all, with respect to our own supremacy, Parliament is supreme in all matters if it wishes to exercise its jurisdiction, and I would suggest it is an appropriate occasion.