I might just clarify first. It's a two-year program, so there was a shot of 500 in the first year, 500 in the second year, and none in the third year. Each student at the master's level got it for one year. I believe it is a recession initiative, but the problem is that it's not good value for the money if it's not taken up in the appropriate way.
If we don't have enough students applying because nobody's actually doing that right now and no one is willing to move into that area, then we spend the money, but we may not have spent it in the best way going forward. I'm not one to say that we don't want the 1,000 scholarships, but I think even if it was the same number but spaced out for three to five years, then people can build programs, people can move into these areas, and we will get more bang for our buck.