To get back to The Economist and Mr. Orr, I just want to say that because his analysis is about aid stagnating, it doesn't necessarily make it the right thing. I should have said in that my previous comment, which was that every party around the table has made a commitment to a timeline to 0.7%, that aid is important. It's interconnected in terms of our impact and our capacity to thrive in the world that we care about how the global economy actually does and how those who are the least among us are doing on this planet.
In terms of your direct question about Bill C-293, I have not seen a noticeable difference. I know there's a commitment on the part of CIDA to focus on thematic priorities. There are discussions and speeches about focusing on the poorest of the poor, which is what the bill lays out about having a poverty-focused aid agenda, which is absolutely crucial. So in terms of actually seeing it roll out into the ground and roll out into implementation, I haven't seen the results of that. I suppose that would require some more digging.