Mr. Morrison, it's never the fault of the interpreters, it must have been something that I said, but I think something was lost in the translation.
I was asking you to address yourself specifically to the following issue. You start a project at $50 million. You've done your call for tenders. You've used a qualifying process to get the best, and it might not even be the lowest, but whether you go with the person who had $50 million, and it was the lowest, or the person who came in at $65 million, but who had better qualifications--you might go to that one--what invariably happens is the dance, the waltz, around the extras begins. On the $65 million project, all of a sudden you realize that what was put into the call for tenders, which was drafted by the engineers, also with their lovely little rings, in the ministry of transport...there's a bunch of things missing, and the dance for the extras begins.
Your $65 million project becomes a $135 million project. We're responsible for looking at how you spend public money. How do we avoid that?