I'll take a crack at it first, then Paul might want to add something.
The problem today is if we want to win a new investment in a board decision somewhere offshore, somewhere outside of Canada, we go there, we make the case. They look at the economics. They don't count the accelerated capital cost allowance. It's not included in the calculation because it will have expired before the investment can take place, before the machinery and equipment can be on-site. We are spending over two years.... It will be 2012 before we even get an environmental approval.
Let's say we get a board decision to make a big investment in Canada to upgrade, to do manufacturing here--