Yes, that's correct. It would be more mathematically based in terms of the modelling that is done.
The group we've been talking to over the last few months has actually done some H1N1 modelling for the federal government, so a lot of it has to do with risk management. But essentially it's a way for loading the appropriate data onto a platform, let's call it. And whether there's a disagreement as to one infrastructure project or another, as long as there's agreement on the data that are being used, we think that there would be a more objective way to determine what would be the priority infrastructure project.
I'm not the modeller so I probably can't explain it as well as the person I've been speaking to, but it is a much more objective-based way to do things.