Oh, I agree. Certainly the length of the benefits should be looked at, maybe not on an individualized basis but as more of a long-term kind of thing, because you only look back for a very short period of time to determine how long their benefits are going to be. And if there are people who have had access to it several times over a short period of time, then maybe their next claim should be a little bit shorter. And for somebody who has paid into it for 25 years and has never collected anything and is now 55 years old and having a difficult time finding employment, if the rules could be changed in that kind of a situation it would certainly help.
One thing I do want to point out, which I didn't mention earlier, is that I don't think we really need to find another dime of new money, because in the last two years the surplus in the account, which was paid by the employees and the employers, was $3.3 billion in 2007 and $2.835 billion in 2008. That is workers' and employers' money that was put into that fund to support these people when they lost their work. So we're not asking you to come up with new funds from anywhere. The money is already there. It has already been put aside by the workers, and now when they need it they should be given that support.