I'll turn to my colleague in just a moment.
I agree--quite a bit, actually--with what Mr. Flexman says. I think that's entirely in the right direction in terms of the answer to your question.
I would also say that internationally there is a growing consensus and standard through the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development about rules on transparency and standards on tax. Of course, Canada is a member in good standing of the OECD. We think that the existence of these standards, which marginalizes and tries to identify and squeeze out tax havens, is entirely the right way to go.
Now, of course there's nothing wrong--Canada is doing this as well--with having competitive tax rates, because it is more attractive for investment into the country. As Mr. Flexman was saying, it makes Canada a very competitive environment.
So we have tax rates that are in many ways competitive or more so than in other jurisdictions. That places Canada in a good environment. I think other jurisdictions legitimately and fairly and in accordance with the OECD rules do try to have the most flexible competitive environment. It does attract investment and uses the rules of the international game according to well-known standards. We think that's appropriate.
Now, tax havens are being squeezed out by these standards, and that's entirely the right way to go as well.