Yes, and we've raised this issue with Transport Canada as well. I think with the safety management system being downloaded, if I may use that expression, to the industry, and not as an additional layer but instead of, we're leaving it to an industry that is also facing economic pressures. In the example you used, they've contracted out that work, yet they have to maintain a safety management system for the work. I'm not sure at all how it is possible.
When they're contracting out the maintenance of various aircraft in another country, it becomes a question of different standards of safety, different economic realities of the job done, and where does the responsibility ultimately rest? In the event of a serious incident, is it Transport Canada that is going to have responsibility because they've changed to allow the industry to self-inspect, who then contracted out to other companies that are not necessarily in Canada? It's a very serious issue.