Well, when we were listening to the member from Chicoutimi, the supporting folks were a little confused as to what it was they actually meant. So there may or may not have to be amendments to be consistent with your working assumption.
The second question has to do with the hard data, and the only hard data you have in the area has to do with the Quebec experience which was roughly a take-up of 7% of the graduates. The working assumption of the bill is that if there is this tax credit, then there will be a flow of people back to the regions. In your analysis of the Quebec data, is that a provable assumption?