I would like to follow on from what my colleague was saying. In your presentation, Ms. Bergevin, you said that one of the main issues the amendment to the act was trying to address was the case of an individual employed by a corporate employer who resigns, establishes his own corporation, and contracts his former employer. Were there any other reasons behind the amendment?
What is more, we know that a lot of public servants do exactly the same thing. They retire and then win contracts with the federal government. Has any particular attention been paid to the status of people who retire and then provide service to the federal government on a contract basis, while at the same time getting their pension? Is that something that has been audited?