I don't mean to harp on this, and I thank you for trying to bring as much clarity as you can to it. I think I understand you, but I still don't know how much the government will realize by this. It's one of the advantages of being government that if the courts rule against CRA and say you are applying the law incorrectly, you just change the law and keep doing what you wanted to do all along.
Had this part 2 not come into this budget implementation bill, you would have had less revenue, but with this change you will have more revenue. There must be an estimate of what the net benefit to the government is of this particular measure of the Budget Implementation Act. Can you share that figure with us?