I have Monsieur Carrier on the same point of order.
I gave a lot of leeway last time about questions on this section. As the chair, I understand there is some concern about that issue. I understand what your concern is, Mr. Mulcair, but I don't understand how that concern relates to Bill C-9.
We have clauses 1646, 1647, and 1648. I understand this was with respect to clause 1647. But as far as the different treatment of crown corporations, I don't see how that relates to clause 1647.
Maybe Monsieur Carrier can clarify this, but how does that concern--which may be a very valid concern, and I'm not saying it isn't--relate to clause 1647 or another clause within Bill C-9?