I'm looking for the triggering event in the bill. The first part of the bill has to do with definitions: the “defined benefit provision”, the “eligible individual”, and the “money purchase provision”. You talk about benefits under the money purchase provision of the plan “if the employer had made the contributions”.
I don't understand why you put what I think should be the triggering event in the definition. There doesn't seem to be any event that actually triggers the claim. You give there how you calculate the money and several other things, but how is Revenue Canada supposed to know there's some basis for this claim? I don't quite follow it.