The problem of that plan, then, is that a state of insolvency, of incapacity to meet one's obligations as they come due, bounces around like a yo-yo on a defined benefit plan, frequently dependent on the state of interest rates and the state of the stock market. It seems to me that this is quite problematic when trying to predict whether you can cover off the costs of Bill C-290. Is that fair?
On June 3rd, 2010. See this statement in context.