Not that I can think of. The original rationale for this in the 1990s was there had been a pretty steady decline in Canadian exploration, particularly for base metals, and it was seen as an important way of stimulating that kind of grassroots exploration. It has been tremendously successful. Since then it has also been really important for diamond exploration.
Coming out of the recession, where exploration took a beating once again, providing a sort of longer-term continuity for this provides industry with the ability to plan long term and not just sort of go year by year, wondering if you are going to have sufficient budgets to carry out your exploration. It allows for longer-term planning.
There is, I believe, a sort of cost to the fisc through this program. The finance department has estimated it as $65 million in lost potential revenue. We would certainly argue that this is more than outweighed by the kind of private sector investment it generates.