Finally, I just want to look at some of the numbers. I must admit, when you start off with the first recommendation about ensuring that the debt-to-GDP ratio falls below 30% by 2015--I mean, it's a nice wish, but to get there means you have to do something. If the Canadian Society of Professional Engineers is correct, where we have a $125 billion infrastructure deficit in Canada, which is going to cost a real reduction in GDP of more than 1% a year if we don't do something about it, the numbers may not work. If you don't get the growth, are you going to have to cut somewhere? Is that your view? And if we do have to cut, where would you cut to meet your target of reducing the debt-to-GDP ratio down to 30% by 2015?
On October 19th, 2010. See this statement in context.