Let's carry on with the chamber for Edmonton. I think you've included in your submission an important area. That's recommendation 5 about program review, basically. Obviously, there has to be an assertion that what's already happening should be happening.
I'd like to go down and look at this. The second-last point you raised in that recommendation was whether the federal government was acting within its well-known constitutional responsibilities. This is always an interesting angle, but as you know, there are many examples of where the province, the municipalities, and the fed get together on cross-jurisdictional issues in the public interest where we have some possibilities of....
Is there any area that you are aware of that possibly could be a constitutional responsibility issue? Ever?