Okay. I appreciate that.
I did want to talk about the two-year writeoff for CCA for five years. I appreciate the recommendation. Obviously I've recommended this in the past, but I just want to challenge the groups here today, because you know what the finance department is going to say, and you know what the Privy Council Office is going to say, which is that if it's a five-year writeoff, it's an immediate fiscal cost to the government of at least $2.3 billion, if not $2.8 billion.
I know your groups will argue that it's a tax deferral, but that is something the Minister of Finance is going to have to deal with immediately--that it is an upfront fiscal cost--and he's going to have to be convinced that there is an economic benefit.
Now, Mr. Tak provided some information with respect to hydrogen, but I would just respectfully state to the groups that you're going to have to make a strong argument with respect to some immediate economic benefits that can be seen to be providing revenues to the government immediately.
Would any of the groups want to address that, Mr. Mains, or Mr. Watkins, Mr. Stothart, with respect to the accelerated capital cost?