A clear thought can be clearly stated, and you have a very clear way of saying things. You said that would force people back into misery. We made investments over the years, and we started to build something that could remove people from misery, and we're going to plunge them right back in because this isn't a priority.
Thank you very much for being here today, Mr. Saillant and Ms. Laflamme.
Even though I have nothing but confidence in the extraordinary qualities of our simultaneous translators, I don't want anything to be lost in translation on this one. I want to make sure I understand, and in fact that's the goal of my question: are there two “Enbridge Inc.”s?
We have before us Mr. Teichroeb, whose title is “Clean Technology”. In his document, he says that Enbridge developed a hybrid fuel cell for pipeline pressure control that is “more efficient and less polluting”.
Is this the same Enbridge that told the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States that everything was fine with its pipeline, and then five days later blew three million litres of crude into the Kalamazoo River? Or has something been lost in the translation?
Tell me that you're a different Enbridge and not the same one.