You are trying to convince us that accessibility everywhere, through valleys and mountains—sometimes the signal does not go through two mountains—is an essential need that should be covered by the state.
Furthermore, I want to know how the 3.5¢, the $130 million paid to the Government of Canada, could be a statistical error. I understand that in New Brunswick it is something else and in Quebec too. How can $130 million, 3.5¢ on a bill of a given amount, be excessive? I think that is a bit of an exaggeration.