I guess the first comment I'd make is that we don't accept the presumption that our industry is heavily subsidized. There's been a lot of material on the record that makes the case, at least from CAPP's perspective, that in fact we are not subsidized.
Again, we think competitiveness matters and that we ought to be looking at how our industry is taxed, how our policy on carbon and other environmental matters in Canada compares with that of the United States in particular, because that's a significant market for us.
Those are the things I would focus on, as opposed to suggesting that we move “subsidies” from one area to another. We don't accept the notion that our industry is in fact subsidized.