You bet. We believe there is no incremental cost, simply because the capital cost allowance that is currently allowed and is 25% would extend the time period the company would have to write off their asset. The accelerated capital cost allowance would mean that they would be able to write that off sooner. But once you get to the end of the write-off period, the amount they've been able to save in taxes or that costs the government is identical.
So if you go back to the paper that I referenced in 2001, by those three gentlemen from Finance, they said, based on the benchmark system that exists--the 25%--if the accelerated capital cost allowance comes along and does not cost the federal government any additional dollars, there is no tax expenditure.