Okay.
My time is limited. I'd like to move on to Mr. Beatty, a former minister of health. I do appreciate the work that you did a long time ago on poverty-related issues.
Mr. Beatty, you did say “keep our word” as part of your.... I guess our word is very important. Particularly today, in a dysfunctional parliament, people get judged on their word.
The government initially proposed in the budget EI increases three times larger than they're proposing now. It looks like they have said that now it's only one-third of the EI increases, so let's give credit to the government for taking that decision.
What really happened is we have created a crisis or an alert, and now we've resolved the problem we created in the first place and somehow we have to get credit.
How do you read the signals it gave to business about having increases of EI three times larger than the current proposed increase?