Evidence of meeting #43 for Finance in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was research.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Bruce Flexman  Chair, Tax Policy Committee, Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
Victor Fiume  President, Canadian Home Builders' Association
Michael Van Pelt  President, Cardus
Ray Pennings  Director of Research, Cardus
Perrin Beatty  President and Chief Executive Officer, Canadian Chamber of Commerce
Ken Kobly  President and Chief Executive Officer, Alberta Chambers of Commerce
Anna MacQuarrie  Director, Policy and Programs, Canadian Association for Community Living
Glen Doucet  Executive Director, Office of Public Policy and Government Relations, Canadian Diabetes Association
Gérald Lemoyne  Mayor, Ville de Lebel-sur-Quévillon
Roger Larson  President, Canadian Fertilizer Institute, Business Tax Reform Coalition
Christopher Wilson  Director of Public Affairs and Advocacy, National Office, Canadian Lung Association
Andrew Halayko  Chair, Research Committee, Canadian Thoracic Society, Canadian Lung Association
Timothy Egan  President and Chief Executive Officer, Canadian Gas Association
Kate McInturff  Executive Director, Canadian Feminist Alliance for International Action
Kathleen A. Lahey  Professor, Faculty of Law, Queen's University, Canadian Feminist Alliance for International Action
Richard Paton  President and Chief Executive Officer, Chemistry Industry Association of Canada
François Bouchard  City Councillor, Ville de Lebel-sur-Quévillon
Alicia Milner  President, Canadian Natural Gas Vehicle Alliance

10:10 a.m.

Director, Policy and Programs, Canadian Association for Community Living

Anna MacQuarrie

Sure. The suggestion we have been looking at is using the disability tax credit eligibility criteria and targeting that at low-income Canadians in particular within that. There is a bigger plan that has actually just been released by the Caledon Institute around a basic income plan for Canadians with severe disabilities, which is the criteria under the disability tax credit.

It would be costed out. The Liberals had done some costing on this a couple of years ago, on about the $350 million mark, if we target the low-income Canadians as one step into a bigger income reform program.

10:10 a.m.

Bloc

Robert Carrier Bloc Alfred-Pellan, QC

Thank you. I see that you are also concerned with reducing poverty in general. You suggest that a committee be formed or a long-term plan established for the government. I hope it is going to listen to you, because this is a problem we run into constantly. When you're an MP, you are asked to address this question. There is poverty, in particular among seniors, whom the government does not want to look after, supposedly because it doesn't have the money because of its other priorities. In any event, I encourage you to continue.

10:10 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

You have one minute left.

10:10 a.m.

Bloc

Robert Carrier Bloc Alfred-Pellan, QC

I have one minute left?

We are given limited time. Thank you, Ms. MacQuarrie.

I have a question for the people from the Canadian Home Builders' Association.

Your concern is stimulating home building. I wanted to get your opinion about the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, which has billions of dollars in its coffers at present. Do you see a way for it to contribute to building affordable housing, which is in short supply everywhere in the country?

10:15 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

A very brief response, please.

10:15 a.m.

President, Canadian Home Builders' Association

Victor Fiume

Certainly I think they had a lot of money in reserves, and I think that's put away for a rainy day. I don't think that was the intent of their funds. We're very satisfied with the CMHC's commitment to making housing affordable to the vast majority of Canadians, and right now I don't see that they have a role to play necessarily directly with reducing the costs of construction.

10:15 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

Thank you.

We'll go to Mr. Wallace, please.

10:15 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

I thank our guests for coming. I have a few questions, so I'm going to go fairly quickly.

For our delegation from the Alberta Chambers of Commerce, in your presentation you talked about the ACCA as a stimulus to getting the oil sands moving a number of years ago, and we have moved to phase that out. Do we have to do both, then, based on these recommendations? Is the oil sand production not doing okay based on the price of oil today? Should we be looking at providing that ACCA support to other industries or other areas that need the stimulus?

10:15 a.m.

President and Chief Executive Officer, Alberta Chambers of Commerce

Ken Kobly

When you look at it, certainly the production coming out of the oil sands is just fine. What we're looking at is expanding the production, perhaps bringing on new, better equipment that can increase productivity, that can also have a decrease in the effect of greenhouse gas emissions.

We do have to remember that we're in a competitive environment here for processing capacity between Canada and the United States.

10:15 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

You have two recommendations. Is one more important than the other?

10:15 a.m.

President and Chief Executive Officer, Alberta Chambers of Commerce

Ken Kobly

I'm sorry, I didn't catch it.

10:15 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Is one of your two recommendations a priority over the other? If we were to do one, which one would you prefer?

10:15 a.m.

President and Chief Executive Officer, Alberta Chambers of Commerce

Ken Kobly

Reintroducing it for the oil sands.

10:15 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Thank you very much.

Just a very quick question for the Home Builders' group. This has nothing to do with party politics, but I'm in favour of having everyone register for the GST, regardless of income level. I used to have a very small business myself. I registered, so it looked like I was bigger than I was.

10:15 a.m.

Voices

Oh, oh!

10:15 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

But in your industry, somebody could be offering a discount for cash. They're not charging GST because they claim they're making under $30,000 a year. So you're competing against somebody who isn't charging and you are. Is that what the issue is?

10:15 a.m.

President, Canadian Home Builders' Association

Victor Fiume

The issue is obviously much deeper than that, but generally that's one of the reasons why their costs are lower than the legitimate taxpaying contractor: they don't remit GST, whether that's a legitimate under $30,000 or whether they just make $100,000 and still don't remit.

10:15 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Okay. My last question is for my chartered accountant friends and maybe the chamber.

Every year I've been here we've heard we need to simplify the tax system. Then we hear from some of your colleagues that we need ACCAs, we need to expand those schedules, we need a tax credit for home renovations, we need a tax credit for this, we need a tax piece for this. You can't have it both ways. You can't have a simplified tax system and then have individual businesses and individuals ask us for different changes to the tax form. That, in my view, adds complexity.

Has your organization—I'll pick on the accountants at this point—had to look through the tax book, which I know is nine inches thick, and point out the things that need to be changed, that need to go to make it simpler? Instead of just talking about reducing the personal income tax rate, do other significant changes need to be made? Has your organization put them on paper and given them to government to have a look at?

10:15 a.m.

Chair, Tax Policy Committee, Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants

Bruce Flexman

It's a very good question, because you're right, people talk about simplification, but then when it comes to some particular program, it runs into some resistance.

We've recommended a few areas where there should be simplification, where I think there could be some major impact. Certainly, completing the process of sales tax harmonization is important. In Canada, a study was done by one of our members that shows 295 taxing points a national business can run into, and that is complexity. Anything toward harmonization helps that.

We've talked about loss consolidation and loss transfers, which is something this committee has recommended to the government. Withholding tax--a number of people have to comply and deal with the tax obligations of another party.

Coming back to the personal tax situation, I think it involves some discipline around looking at whether the tax system is the best mechanism to deliver the benefits. I think in many cases an economist would tell you no.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Does your association have those issues in writing in their submission somewhere that I have not seen?

10:20 a.m.

Chair, Tax Policy Committee, Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants

Bruce Flexman

Yes, we have more detailed briefs that we can get to the committee that deal with—

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

On your website?

10:20 a.m.

Chair, Tax Policy Committee, Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants

Bruce Flexman

It will be going up on the website, yes.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Thank you very much.

10:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative James Rajotte

Thank you, Mr. Wallace. Unfortunately, that round is out of time.

We'll have Mr. Brison now, please.