That is going to be my last question, because I would like to address another subject with Ms. MacQuarrie.
In the early 1960s, the NDP advanced the principle of universal, public, free health insurance. The main consideration was hospitalization. There is a paradox in your analysis. A person who is not being adequately cared for at home with drugs because the cost is not covered is going to end up in hospital. In hospital, on the other hand, everything will be paid for. So there is a kind of paradoxical perversity in the system. For the province, at least, there is practically an incentive to find a solution for the future. The agreement with the federal government would cover hospitalization, which reflects how medicine was seen 50 years ago, but we would also contemplate, for the future, that ambulatory medicine would be a firmly established part of our day to day concerns.
In other words, for the 2014 negotiations, should we not be making sure that the drugs, the tests, and so on are a mandatory part of what is negotiated, and that the funding cover that too?