I think you raise an interesting point. I think the committee would want to consider whether or not there was a way to segregate the charitable activity from the people who solicit the funds. I don't see it as a problem. You said you agreed with the principle.
What I heard was some pretty strong language about intrusiveness in a flawed piece of legislation. Other than the salary cap, which is off the table, is there anything else in this bill that anyone would characterize as flawed? If so, can you tell us what that is and why?