The difficulty is that normally in these kinds of circumstances we do an assessment of the impacts from a privacy perspective, and that would include the risk to security in terms of revealing names and/or salaries. It is hard for me to say that there would be no instances when we wouldn't prefer to protect the name of an individual, let's say, as being someone who worked in a women's shelter or in another type of organization. I am ill-prepared at this point, without having done the full analysis, to categorically say that we would be okay with a “shall” just for the compensation.
On December 8th, 2010. See this statement in context.