Mr. Chairman, I would prefer the “shall” wording, from the technical basis that a post office box.... I spent five years on the board of Interim Place, a shelter for battered women. I'm aware of the sensitivities. There are three locations now in our community, and I think they're all pretty well discreetly positioned and taken care of. But this is one situation. Since the U.S. has found ways, I'm pretty sure that, with the assurance here of the officials, a post office box.... I don't know what's on the registration of the charity, which is also public information, but I suspect that they've already handled it there, so that any disclosure of an address on that registration probably has already dealt with the same problem we're concerned with now. The shelters are not, in my view, a good example of why we should retain the discretion.
Other than shelters for battered women, are there any other groups or classes of organizations, charitable organizations, that would have any similar sensitivities?