Exactly on that point, Mr. Page, as the budgetary officer, I think you've correctly pointed out four key risk opportunities, if you want to call them opportunities.
Why do you not present it this way? I expect you to do the analysis: based on these assumptions, this is what the deficit will be; based on those assumptions, that will be the deficit. And you give us a range. We're not asking you to be right or wrong. We're saying that if those assumptions become accurate,whether that's the GDP, job growth, or all those other things, this is where the deficit will be in 2015 if the results are this.
Why is there not a range? Why is the glass, in your presentation today, in my view, completely half empty and not half full, when we are hearing good news on the economic scene?
Why are you not providing parliamentarians with an analysis instead of an opinion?