So you picked on transfer payments for health care--which are based on a policy decision and a political decision--and where we're going with them. I actually agree with Mr. Paillé that maybe you should have had a broader approach.
There's a fair amount of politics in your statement today, in my view. For example, I have sent your office, numerous times, when there's been a private member's bill from the opposition, questions about how much funding it would take. I've asked you to tell me what it's going to cost, and you do a great job of letting me know, 90% of the time, that there isn't enough information, that the wording is so wishy-washy you can't make a determination, and that you would have to set up a whole new model and so on and so forth.
I don't see a comment about parliamentarians losing control over fiduciary responsibility. You're willing to comment on a motion by this committee on how economic information from departments, which we've declared is cabinet confidence, is an issue--