He said that I was saying the research is legitimate because they're in the public sector. If I inferred that to you, I want to correct that. The research is legitimate because it's peer reviewed. Somebody like Glen Hodgson, who's not in the university, can publish--and has--through the peer-reviewed process. So it's legitimate because it's peer reviewed, not because they're from the public sector or the private sector.
People in the private sector are every bit as legitimate as people in the public sector, so I don't want to leave the idea, as Mr. Mulcair did, that only people in the public sector are legit and that people in the private sector are somehow, I don't know, illegitimate. That's not true, and I've worked in both the private and the public....
To answer your question, I'm obviously opposed to the policy, because the research is very clear. It harms...I don't think everybody heard the whole explanation. The OECD research for 10 years, across many, many scholars, has found that income per capita goes down. Or you can put it in reverse: the lower the corporate taxes, the higher the income per person. The scholarship is very clear on that.
So I'm answering your question: if corporate taxation goes up, income per capita will go down.