That was the main theory by the people who put it all together, and we've heard there are some problems.
The government can do more. Last year, in the budget, they introduced enhanced reporting for those who market aggressive international tax, and I think that was an important step.
In the late 1990s, there were a variety of scandals. KPMG was subjected to a heavy fine because they would go to a multinational CFO, for instance, and say, “I can save you $500 million in taxes next year through my international tax shelter, or whatever I save you, I'll take 30%.” This led to a proliferation of these sorts of schemes, which are tax avoidance and not evasion. They're attempts to reduce global tax liability while complying with all rules.
Now we're forcing the marketers to disclose. I do think the accounting profession could be better regulated, but regulating lawyers is a different story. I'm a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada, and we don't like government interference. We don't want the government to tell us, for instance, to disclose confidential client information. But I think, certainly for the accountants, enhanced disclosure is required.